Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?
Does the potter not have the right over the clay, to make from the same lump [of clay] one object for honorable use [something beautiful or distinctive] and another for common use [something ordinary
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same mass (lump) one vessel for beauty and distinction and honorable use, and another for menial or ignoble and dishonorable use?
And does not the potter have the authority over the clay to make, from the same material, indeed, one vessel unto honor, yet truly another unto disgrace?
Or has the potter no right over the clay, to make from the same lump one piece of pottery for honor and another for dishonor?
Doesn’t the potter have the power over the clay to make one pot for special purposes and another for garbage from the same lump of clay?
Or has the potter no right to make from a given lump of clay this pot for honorable use and that one for dishonorable?
Doesn't a potter have the right to make a fancy bowl and a plain bowl out of the same lump of clay?”
Doesn't a potter have the right to make a fancy bowl and a plain bowl out of the same lump of clay?”
Doesn't a potter have the right to make a fancy bowl and a plain bowl out of the same lump of clay?”
Or has not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour?
Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Somebody who makes pots can choose to make any kind of pot. He can use the same piece of clay to make two different pots. One of the pots may be for special parties. The other pot is for dirty things.
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?
Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?
Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?
A potter has the right to do whatever he wants with his clay. He can make something for a special occasion or something for everyday use from the same lump of clay.
Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?
After all, the man who makes the pots has the right to use the clay as he wishes, and to make two pots from the same lump of clay, one for special occasions and the other for ordinary use.
After all, the man who makes the pots has the right to use the clay as he wishes, and to make two pots from the same lump of clay, one for special occasions and the other for ordinary use.
After all, the man who makes the pots has the right to use the clay as he wishes, and to make two pots from the same lump of clay, one for special occasions and the other for ordinary use.
Or has the potter no right over the clay, to make from the same lump one piece of pottery for honor and another for dishonor?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?
Or does not the potter have authority over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?
Or does the potter not have authority over the clay, to make from the same lump a vessel that is for honorable use and one that is for ordinary use?
Does the potter not have power over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?
Or does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one object for honorable use, and another for common use?
Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use?
The potter can make anything he wants to make. He can use the same clay to make one thing for special use and another thing for daily use.
Has the potter no right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special use and another for ordinary use?
Isn’t the potter free to make different kinds of pots out of the same lump of clay? Some are for special purposes. Others are for ordinary use.
Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?
Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?
Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?
When a potter makes jars out of clay, doesn’t he have a right to use the same lump of clay to make one jar for decoration and another to throw garbage into?
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one object for special use and another for ordinary use?
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one object for special use and another for ordinary use?
God made everything First of all, a long time ago, God made everything. He made the sky, and he made the earth. He made all the things that are everywhere. The earth didn’t have any shape. It d
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for beauty and another for menial use?
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for beauty and another for menial use?
Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
SONG 1,6,8,6tune: St. Flavian, 100.Genesis 1 -11 Let heav’n arise, let earth appear,said the Almighty Lord:The heav’n arose, the earth appear’d,at his creating word. Thick darknes
Who in the world do you think you are to second-guess God? Do you for one moment suppose any of us knows enough to call God into question? Clay doesn’t talk back to the fingers that mold it, saying, “
Does not the potter have authority over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for value and another not for value?
Does the potter have no right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honor and another for common use?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?
Whether a potter of clay hath not power to make of the same gobbet one vessel into honour, another into despite, [or low office]?
hath not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make the one vessel to honour, and the one to dishonour?
El versiculo Romans, 9:21 de La Sagrada Biblia consiste en algo que es aconsejable tener continuamente presente con el fin de reflexionar sobre él. Acaso deberíamos hacernos la pregunta ¿Qué trataba de manifestarnos Nuestro Padre Todopoderoso con el versículo Romans, 9:21? ¿Cuáles son los momentos de nuestro día a día en que tenemos la oportunidad de hacer valer aquello que hemos llegado a saber gracias al versículo Romans, 9:21 de La Sagrada Biblia?
Hacer un análisis profundo sobre el versículo Romans, 9:21 nos supone una ayuda a ser más agradables a los ojos de el Creador del Cielo y de la Tierra y a aproximarnos más a Dios, por eso es aconsejable recurrir al versículo Romans, 9:21 todas las veces que pueda servirnos de guía para saber en qué forma acturar o para traer la paz a nuestros corazones.